Sixty-six years ago George Orwell portrayed in his novel ‘1984’ a
fictional entity called “Big Brother” who is claimed to rule a
totalitarian state, creating a society that is under total surveillance
by the authorities. Citizens are constantly reminded of this by the
slogan “Big Brother is watching you”, an aphorism which is omnipresent
on screens. In modern human society, Big Brother is inherent to abuse of
civil rights, specifically in terms of mass surveillance. As bad as
this may seem for human populations, however, mass surveillance by
telemetry is arguably the most important and potent tool ecologists and
conservationists have to protect natural populations and their habitats
in increasingly human-dominated land- and seascapes.
In early 2014, the Bimini Biological Field Station (BBFS) established
our equivalent of ‘Big Brother’ – an extensive acoustic underwater
listening array, placed strategically in Bimini’s diverse marine
habitats to monitor the movements of sharks and rays, tagged with
10-year transmitters. Each animal’s tag broadcasts its acoustic signal,
every 90s or so and if within range of a receiver (i.e. ~500m), its ID,
date and time stamp are recorded. Data builds, from minute to hour to
day, month to year across different tidal phases, seasons etc. For the
next three years I will use this data to identify drivers of movement,
habitat preferences, spatial hotspots and mechanisms of habitat
partitioning for Bimini’s local shark and ray fauna.
Only a few months ago I arrived at the station as a Principal
Investigator to lead this project and have recently summarized our last
18 months of data. Some 48 sharks and rays from 7 species were detected
by Bimini’s “Big Brother”. Interestingly, my first exploratory analysis
has revealed that some species show a diverse habitat range throughout
Bimini (e.g. an adult lemon shark detected on 34 receivers), whilst
movements of others (e.g. southern stingray: 7 receivers) are more
confined. It also appears that some habitats off southwest Bimini likely
function as important corridors or highways for shark movement,
detecting 20-30+ individuals. Further, I excitingly received information
of our sharks ‘making moves’ outside of our array. Two male nurse
sharks were detected in Andros and Grand Bahama, as well as migrating
lemon sharks between Jupiter (Florida), Bimini and Florida Keys.
Surveillance arrays like the one deployed in Bimini provide valuable
information regarding behavior, habitat and space use of sharks and rays
on small geographic scales. While this information is crucial for
effective conservation of local habitats, information about movements on
scales of areas, countries or even continents is paramount to protect
the populations that occupy them to conserve them for generations to
come. Hence, small receiver arrays are gradually becoming larger and
connected to other receiver arrays, creating large geographic scale
networks. So is mass surveillance all that bad? I guess it’s a matter of
perspective.
Piece written for Save our Seas Foundation, and published on their website here too: http://saveourseas.com/update/mass-surveillance-not-all-that-bad/
No comments:
Post a Comment